<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health of the web and mobile site redirections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stechz.com/2010/health-of-the-web-and-mobile-site-redirections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stechz.com/2010/health-of-the-web-and-mobile-site-redirections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manriques</title>
		<link>http://stechz.com/2010/health-of-the-web-and-mobile-site-redirections/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Manriques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stechz.com/?p=114#comment-115</guid>
		<description>It might be a good idea reading W3C recommendations about mobile web development: http://www.w3.org/mobile</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be a good idea reading W3C recommendations about mobile web development: <a href="http://www.w3.org/mobile" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/mobile</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby Russell</title>
		<link>http://stechz.com/2010/health-of-the-web-and-mobile-site-redirections/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stechz.com/?p=114#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I agree. Don&#039;t send to anyone something you wouldn&#039;t send to mobile users.
One of the big problems with the mobile web dichotomy is that website operators continue to expect desktop users&#039; screens to be of a certain width. Imagine what a boon to productivity it would be if users en masse would become comfortable running applications taking up less than half a screen, and developers would send the appropriate content and style sheets down the pipe that allows everyone to do so. For example, the display I&#039;m using now is 1280 pixels across and physically wider than two typical pages from a book, even laid flat. Yet with most websites, I can&#039;t view more than one page on the same screen without invoking cumbersome horizontal scroll. Instead I&#039;m required to read paragraphs at widths shown to cause reading efficiency to drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Don&#8217;t send to anyone something you wouldn&#8217;t send to mobile users.</p>
<p>One of the big problems with the mobile web dichotomy is that website operators continue to expect desktop users&#8217; screens to be of a certain width. Imagine what a boon to productivity it would be if users en masse would become comfortable running applications taking up less than half a screen, and developers would send the appropriate content and style sheets down the pipe that allows everyone to do so. For example, the display I&#8217;m using now is 1280 pixels across and physically wider than two typical pages from a book, even laid flat. Yet with most websites, I can&#8217;t view more than one page on the same screen without invoking cumbersome horizontal scroll. Instead I&#8217;m required to read paragraphs at widths shown to cause reading efficiency to drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://stechz.com/2010/health-of-the-web-and-mobile-site-redirections/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stechz.com/?p=114#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t.  Treat *everything* as a &quot;performance-sensitive environment&quot;.  If you have content that you feel comfortable presenting your site without, throw it away; it must not really have content in it, just presentation.
Certainly I&#039;d suggest trying to scale well down to small screens, within reason.  But in terms of not loading content, why not make your site faster for standard computer users too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t.  Treat *everything* as a &#8220;performance-sensitive environment&#8221;.  If you have content that you feel comfortable presenting your site without, throw it away; it must not really have content in it, just presentation.</p>
<p>Certainly I&#8217;d suggest trying to scale well down to small screens, within reason.  But in terms of not loading content, why not make your site faster for standard computer users too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

